Movie Review: Little Women
What We Liked
What We Didn't Like
Given that there have been myriad adaptations of Louisa May Alcott’s classic tome, Little Women, including (but not limited to) the heralded George Cukor classic from 1933 as well as Gillian Armstrong’s equally impressive interpretation in 1994—it’s surprising that a new take on the tale from writer/director Greta Gerwig would feel so fresh and new. But that’s exactly what this remarkable filmmaker has delivered with her second feature.
Gerwig infuses the tale of the March sisters coming of age in Civil War-era America with an updated story-telling style that effortlessly blends elements of the original beloved text. Told in a unique non-linear fashion, the story can seem confusing at times (such as when a character leaves via one side of a room only to re-enter on the other side of that same room months, or possibly even years, later in one fluid sequence), but once compensated for and then expected, the effect only adds to the aesthetic at play in this uniquely heartfelt and effective film. Given Gerwig’s impressive directorial debut with Lady Bird (2017), this singular adaption of a much-adored classic suggests that great things will continue to pour from this obviously gifted filmmaker.
Anchoring Gerwig’s film is Saorise Ronan as Alcott’s Jo March. It is though this remarkable actress (who also turned in a tour de force performance in Gerwig’s aforementioned Lady Bird) that the saga of the March sisters unfolds. Jo’s sisters: the shy Beth (Eliza Scanlen); immature and vindictive Amy (Florence Pugh); and conventional Meg (Emma Watson) all try to maintain a relatively intact universe along with their mother, Marmee (Laura Dern), while father (Bob Odenkirk) is off fighting in the war. All of these players are allowed at least one moment to shine at some point during the film (some more than others, but that’s simply the nature of the narrative) and this balanced effort pays dividends as all of the characters come off as believable and their actions intrinsically identifiable throughout.
Another player of note within the cast is the ever-dependable Meryl Streep as the soured Aunt March, who, at one point, seems to serve as the antithesis to everything that Jo believes she stands for and believes in. Timothée Chalamet, as Laurie, similarly delivers a well-rounded and likeable performance as the unrealized object of Jo’s affection. Although there is a plethora of characters at work here, at no time do they seem shorted (at least narratively speaking) and all are allowed at least one defining scene to themselves.
Again, the non-linear approach to Alcott’s Little Women allows for a greater flexibility throughout and ultimately yields interesting results as the film unfurls. Suffice it to say, that by the conclusion, the triumph of storytelling and filmmaking that has been achieved here is nothing short of remarkable as something so treasured, and familiar, is made new, exciting, and incredibly vital and timely.
Mike Tyrkus
Latest posts by Mike Tyrkus (see all)
- Box-Office Weekend: Venom Takes Over - October 27, 2024
- Box-Office Weekend: Smile, You’re in First - October 21, 2024
- Podcast Ep. 95: “Piece By Piece” - October 14, 2024