Movie Review: The King’s Man
What We Liked
What We Didn't Like
The King’s Man is a prequel to the earlier films in the series that began with Kingsman: The Secret Service (2014) and continued with Kingsman: The Golden Circle (2017). The release of this latest film in the series was delayed considerably due to the COVID-19 pandemic, but it is hard to understand exactly why the end product was ultimately released as it proves to be completely devoid of the wit and humor that made the first two films the unexpected gems that they were.
In The King’s Man, Orlando, the Duke of Oxford (Ralph Fiennes) promises his wife on her deathbed that he will keep their son safe. To do so, Orlando devotes his life to pacifism and guides his son to do the same. However, as World War I begins to gather momentum, pulling more and more countries into the mix, the now older Conrad (Harris Dickinson) feels the pull to serve his country against his father’s wishes and devises a way to serve on the front lines without his father’s consent.
Unbeknownst to Conrad though, Orlando is actually the architect of a network of spies sequestered in the service industry that might be the key to bringing the war to an early end. Orlando’s team, which includes his loyal servants Shola (Djimon Hounsou) and Polly (Gemma Arterton) – and eventually Conrad – ultimately end up being the only thing that may have a chance of stopping the nefarious plot orchestrated by the sinister Rasputin (Rhys Ifans) before the entire world descends into chaos.
While the story feels, at least on the surface, as though it could be intriguing spy thriller, there is very little that is enacted throughout the film to make it such. Instead, the film straddles a blurry, often non-existent line between the traits of a straight-up action film and the more light-hearted tone of its predecessors with very little success. Although the screenplay by Karl Gajdusek and Matthew Vaughn (who also directed this and the previous two installments) does offer the occasional entertaining passage – a few of the moments on the well-executed battlefield are brief highlights of the film – everything else feels lackadaisical and unfocused.
None of the actors featured in the film fair any better than the story as they seem as though they are as befuddled by the hodge-podge of a film they are stuck in, as is everyone else. Ultimately, The King’s Man offers viewers very little of the charm, wit, and entertainment value that was far more plentiful in its predecessors.
Mike Tyrkus
Latest posts by Mike Tyrkus (see all)
- Box-Office Weekend: Moana Makes it Three - December 15, 2024
- Podcast Ep. 96: “Gladiator II” - December 13, 2024
- Box-Office Weekend: Moana Dominates Again - December 8, 2024